Expand the following panels for additional search options.

WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp.

Court excludes expert’s reasonable royalty analysis because it assumed a “financially catastrophic” deal for the licensor, one that would have eliminated all profits and revenues.

New academic study of patent litigation and cost of capital

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc. (III)

Order on motions in limine and Daubert motions.

Real View, LLC v. 20-20 Technologies (I)

Federal district court excludes hypothetical royalty for copyrighted software based on expert’s failure to rely on any comparable licenses or adequately explain their differences from his estimated 35% rate.

Understanding IP obsolescence

Kodak free to proceed with patent auction

Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (I)

Federal district court precludes defendant’s expert from apportioning damages for infringement of a design patent (as opposed to utility patent) as contrary to the statutory remedy, but denies most Daubert objections against the plaintiff’s expert.

Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co.

Court affirms $23 million patent infringement award based on apportionment analysis of the plaintiff’s expert, which relied on internal as well as external documentation of value of patented technology without improperly invoking entire market value of in ...

Federal Court Strikes Portions of Its Own Expert’s Report

Last year, when a federal district judge (William Alsup) couldn’t convince the parties to select (and pay for) an independent expert, he enlisted the court’s powers under Rule 706 FRE to appoint an economics professor to calculate damages.

Patent Damages for ‘Lost Opportunity Value’ Pass Daubert

Court admits expert’s “lost opportunity value analysis” for calculating damages, finding that Georgia-Pacific reasonably royalty damages and lost profits are not exclusive remedies in patent infringement cases.

676 - 700 of 1,630 results