Patent Damages for ‘Lost Opportunity Value’ Pass Daubert

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 6
Legal and Court Case Update
June 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (959 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3841 Surgical and Medical Instruments and Apparatus
339112 Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing
intellectual property
economic damages & lost profits
Pulse Medical Instruments, Inc. v. Drug Impairment Detection Services, Inc.
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32467
March 12, 2012
US
Federal Court
Maryland
United States District Court
Carlos Valeiras (plaintiff); David Harkavy (defendant)
Chasanow

Summary

Court admits expert’s “lost opportunity value analysis” for calculating damages, finding that Georgia-Pacific reasonably royalty damages and lost profits are not exclusive remedies in patent infringement cases.

See Also

Pulse Medical Instruments, Inc. v. Drug Impairment Detection Services, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
March 12, 2012

Court admits expert’s “lost opportunity value analysis” for calculating damages, finding that Georgia-Pacific reasonably royalty damages and lost profits are not exclusive remedies in patent infringement cases.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 6
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition