Pulse Medical Instruments, Inc. v. Drug Impairment Detection Services, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 12, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,044 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3841 Surgical and Medical Instruments and Apparatus
339112 Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing
intellectual property
economic damages & lost profits
Pulse Medical Instruments, Inc. v. Drug Impairment Detection Services, Inc.
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32467
US
Federal Court
Maryland
United States District Court
Carlos Valeiras (plaintiff); David Harkavy (defendant)
Chasanow

Summary

Court admits expert’s “lost opportunity value analysis” for calculating damages, finding that Georgia-Pacific reasonably royalty damages and lost profits are not exclusive remedies in patent infringement cases.
Pulse Medical Instruments, Inc. v. Drug Impairment Detection Service, Inc.
PDF, Size: 44 KB

See Also

Patent Damages for ‘Lost Opportunity Value’ Pass Daubert

Legal and Court Case Update
June 2012

Court admits expert’s “lost opportunity value analysis” for calculating damages, finding that Georgia-Pacific reasonably royalty damages and lost profits are not exclusive remedies in patent infringement cases.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Second Edition
Business Valuation in Healthcare Case Law Compendium