Summary
Court affirms $23 million patent infringement award based on apportionment analysis of the plaintiff’s expert, which relied on internal as well as external documentation of value of patented technology without improperly invoking entire market value of in ...
Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
PDF, Size: 456 KB
See Also
What It Takes to Succeed on a Patent Apportionment Analysis
Federal district court precludes defendant’s expert from apportioning damages for infringement of a design patent (as opposed to utility patent) as contrary to the statutory remedy, but denies most Daubert objections against the plaintiff’s expert.