What It Takes to Succeed on a Patent Apportionment Analysis

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 10
Legal and Court Case Update
October 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (977 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4813 Telephone Communications, Except Radiotelephone
334220 Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing
intellectual property
Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90398
June 28, 2012
US
Federal Court
Texas
United States District Court
James Nawrocki
Davis

Summary

Federal district court precludes defendant’s expert from apportioning damages for infringement of a design patent (as opposed to utility patent) as contrary to the statutory remedy, but denies most Daubert objections against the plaintiff’s expert.

See Also

Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co.

Full Text of Court Cases
June 28, 2012

Court affirms $23 million patent infringement award based on apportionment analysis of the plaintiff’s expert, which relied on internal as well as external documentation of value of patented technology without improperly invoking entire market value of in ...