Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (I)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 30, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,214 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4813 Telephone Communications, Except Radiotelephone
334220 Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing
intellectual property
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (I)
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90877
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
Terry Musika (plaintiff); Michael Wagner (defendant)
Koh

Summary

Federal district court precludes defendant’s expert from apportioning damages for infringement of a design patent (as opposed to utility patent) as contrary to the statutory remedy, but denies most Daubert objections against the plaintiff’s expert.
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (I)
PDF, Size: 120 KB

See Also

Patent Expert Asserts Flawed License and Legal Conclusions

Legal and Court Case Update
October 2012

Federal district court precludes defendant’s expert from apportioning damages for infringement of a design patent (as opposed to utility patent) as contrary to the statutory remedy, but denies most Daubert objections against the plaintiff’s expert.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition