BVResearch Pro
Stay appraised of all the latest business considerations in the jewelry industry! The report explains how jewelry stores operate, the nature of their revenue streams, value drivers, the industry environment, the risks involved, and other key factors.
Search Tips Expand the following panels for additional search options.
Eslami v. Eslami
At issue was the valuation of husband's medical practice.
Healthcare v. Orr
Appeals court says noncompete/nonsolicitation clauses accompanying sale of solo practitioner’s medical practice to large healthcare provider are unenforceable where buyer allocated zero dollar value to practice’s goodwill; court strikes down injunction.
Peltzer v. Peltzer
Appellate court rules doctor husband who knew his expert was the only appraiser of his practice cannot blame trial court for relying on expert’s unclear discount in valuation.
In re Marriage of McTiernan
At trial, a popular movie director is found to possess professional goodwill—and the California appellate court is forced to go “goodwill hunting.”
Clark v. Clark
At issue is the valuation of the husband's medical practice.
Ford v. Ford
One issue in this case was the valuation of goodwill in a medical practice.
Rodriguez v. Hosp. San Cristobal, Inc.
The district court in this case excluded the testimony of the plaintiffs’ medical expert witness in this medical malpractice case, citing Rule 702, resulting in a summary judgment against the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs appealed, but the circuit court affirmed the district court, citing Rule 702 in affirming the exclusion of the plaintiffs’ witness. Even though the 2023 amended Rule 702 was cited, the circuit court reverted back to the pre-amended Rule 702 to bolster its exclusion of the witness.
Estate of Cartwright v. Commissioner (II)
At issue is the valuation of the deceased's share of stock in a law firm in which he was the majority shareholder.
Hazard v. Hazard
Issues were the value of husband's medical practice and whether goodwill in the practice was a marital asset.
Detter v. Miracle Hills Animal Hospital PC (II)
One issue in this corporate dissolution case was the inclusion of goodwill in the value of the corporation.
Hill v. Hill
Trial court was justified in disregarding any commercial goodwill in husband’s interest in a professional practice and relying on partnership agreement, Texas appeals court finds, where goodwill is not accessible and expert testimony as to its existence a ...
Detter v. Miracle Hills Animal Hospital PC (III)
The Nebraska Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and held that the goodwill of a professional practice may be included as an asset when valuing a professional practice for the purposes of a judicial buyout to avoid dissolution of the practice. It ...
Moore v. Getahun
Ontario Court of Appeal strikes down prior ruling mandating documentation and disclosure of communication between counsel and expert, noting expert-attorney collaboration is “essential” to ensure careful case preparation and timely delivery of justice.
Ackerman v. Ackerman
In reasonable compensation case, trial court discredits salary surveys not sufficiently “fine-tuned” to area and type of practice of the subject practitioner.
Shire ViroPharma Inc. v. CSL Behring LLC
In this patent infringement case, the court ruled on a plethora of Daubert/Rule 702 challenges. The opinion provides an exhaustive list of Daubert-related issues that the court ruled on and provides a good tutorial on the real purposes of Daubert.
Clukey v. Clukey
At issue is the valuation of husband's chiropractic business.
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. GI Dynamics, Inc.
Court denies summary judgment motion, finding sufficient damages evidence for misappropriation of trade secrets—even for early-stage technology—based on the actual pricing data by the competitor, which valued the risk at various stages of development.
Medtronic, Inc. v. Commissioner (I)
In transfer pricing case centering on taxpayer’s intercompany licensing agreements, Tax Court finds CUT method is the best way to calculate arm’s-length royalty rates; court accepts taxpayer-proposed uncontrolled comparable but makes adjustments to account for differences in transactions.
Goswami v. Goswami
The trial court performed its own valuation of husband's medical practice, which was higher than both experts values. The court of appeals affirmed.
Mark Choi, D.D.S. v. Edward L. Harvey
The California Court of Appeals, First Appellate District affirmed the trial court’s award of damages for fraud in connection with the sale of a dental practice. The practice’s actual fair market value was determined as a percentage of the latest year’s g ...
St. Elizabeth Home Society v. Hamilton (City)
In St. Elizabeth Home Society v. Hamilton (City), 2005 Can LII 46411 (ON S.C.) (decided December 13, 2005), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered issues involving the liability and the quantum of damages stemming from allegedly defamatory state ...
Ellington v. Ellington
The primary issue was the value of the parties cotton trading business, Noble Ellington Cotton Company, Inc. (NECC).
Gentile v. Gentile
Appellate court affirms lower court’s Fair Market Value (FMV) determination of husband’s S corp. medical practice, which incorporates goodwill value the wife’s expert calculated based on the Goodwill Registry.
Vedros v. Vedros
Court says discounting for lack of marketability of minority interest in home healthcare agency, operating as an S corporation, is appropriate where LLC agreement included transfer restrictions and partners were not planning to buy out owner spouse.
Woodruff v. Tomlin
At issue is legal malpractice from from the manner in which the defendants handled litigation on behalf of the plaintiffs.