Ackerman v. Ackerman

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
December 27, 2006

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,591 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
marital dissolution/divorce
Ackerman v Ackerman
2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 2056
US
State Court
California
Court of Appeals
Brian G. Saylin, Ellen G. Winterbottom, Jeffrey W. Doeringer, Keith E. Dolnick
James Christensen (husband); Glenn Mehner (wife)
Rylaarsdam

Summary

In reasonable compensation case, trial court discredits salary surveys not sufficiently “fine-tuned” to area and type of practice of the subject practitioner.
Ackerman v Ackerman
PDF, Size: 62 KB

See Also

Key to Reasonable Compensation: Relate the Surveys to the Specific Professional

Legal and Court Case Update
March 2007

In reasonable compensation case, trial court discredits salary surveys not sufficiently “fine-tuned” to area and type of practice of the subject practitioner.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Healthcare Case Law Compendium