Vedros v. Vedros

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 25, 2017

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (10,780 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8082 Home Health Care Services
621610 Home Health Care Services
marital dissolution/divorce
goodwill, discount for lack of control (DLOC), expert testimony, discount for lack of marketability (DLOM), minority interest, distribution, community property, s corporation
Vedros v. Vedros
2017 La. App. LEXIS 2027
US
State Court
Louisiana
Court of Appeal
James Plonsey (court-appointed); Michele Avery (husband); Charles Brown, James Beal (industry experts, wife)
Chaisson

Summary

Court says discounting for lack of marketability of minority interest in home healthcare agency, operating as an S corporation, is appropriate where LLC agreement included transfer restrictions and partners were not planning to buy out owner spouse.
Vedros v. Vedros
PDF, Size: 729 KB

See Also

Facts Support Discounts in Valuation of Small Healthcare Agency

Court Case Digests
October 25, 2017

Court says discounting for lack of marketability of minority interest in home healthcare agency, operating as an S corporation, is appropriate where LLC agreement included transfer restrictions and partners were not planning to buy out owner spouse.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition