Goswami v. Goswami

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 20, 2003

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,757 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
marital dissolution/divorce
goodwill
Goswami v. Goswami
152 Ohio App. 3d 151, 2003 Ohio 803, 787 N.E.2d 26, 2003 Ohio App. LEXIS 760
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Diana Kennon, CPA (for wife); James F. Kacsmar, CPA (for husband)
Waite

Summary

The trial court performed its own valuation of husband's medical practice, which was higher than both experts values. The court of appeals affirmed.

See Also

Medical Practice Higher Using Last Year's Earnings Versus Normalized Earnings

Legal and Court Case Update
May 2003

In valuing the husbands medical practice, both experts used the capitalization of income approach and the same cap rate.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition