In re Trapp
The primary issue in this Illinois appeal of a divorce decree dealt with the value of a company owning two buildings. The primary tenant in both buildings was the husband’s electrician business. The trial court accepted the value of the real estate company the husband’s business valuation expert, who was not a real estate appraiser, submitted. The business appraiser valued the two buildings using what the court determined to be “competent evidence.”
Illinois Appeals Court Affirms Trial Court’s Acceptance of Real Estate Value in Absence of Wife’s Submission of a Competing Value
The primary issue in this Illinois appeal of a divorce decree dealt with the value of a company owning two buildings. The primary tenant in both buildings was the husband’s electrician business. The trial court accepted the value of the real estate company the husband’s business valuation expert, who was not a real estate appraiser, submitted. The business appraiser valued the two buildings using what the court determined to be “competent evidence.”
Look Under the Covers: Finding Assets and Income for a Divorce Valuation
Have you ever wondered how Business Valuation and Forensic analysis intercept? We know that financial data in a company’s books and records may not tell the entire story. But do you know how to analyze it to make your valuation more meaningful? This webinar will give you the steps to begin to unravel and follow the money which could lead to more accurate results.
BV News and Trends October 2022
A monthly roundup of key developments of interest to business valuation experts.
Mikalacki v. Rubezic
In this Arizona marital dissolution case, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s acceptance of a calculation of value to determine the value of a couple’s law practice, awarded to the husband as part of the equitable distribution. Other matters not related to valuation issues were part of the appellate decision.
Arizona Appeals Court Affirms Trial Court’s Acceptance of a Calculation of Value
In this Arizona marital dissolution case, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s acceptance of a calculation of value to determine the value of a couple’s law practice, awarded to the husband as part of the equitable distribution. Other matters not related to valuation issues were part of the appellate decision.
Divorce courts getting flexible on valuation dates
One of the interesting points made at the recent AAML/BVR National Divorce Conference was that judges in marital dissolution cases now tend to want more current valuations, particularly when subsequent events may have impacted value.
Great turnout for the AAML/BVR National Divorce Conference
The AAML/BVR National Divorce Conference harkened back to prepandemic times as family law attorneys and valuation experts met in person in Las Vegas September 18-20.
Divorce Highlight: Last chance—AAML/BVR Divorce Conference starts Sunday September 18
Connect with divorce attorneys from across the US at the AAML/BVR National Divorce Conference in Las Vegas September 18-20.
Divorce Highlight: PPP loans, goodwill, BIG tax in recent divorce cases
How do you treat a PPP loan in a marital dissolution case?
Divorce Highlight: Hitchner’s wrath continues regarding Damodaran’s attacks
Speaking at the NACVA’s Business Valuation & Financial Litigation Super Conference last week, Jim Hitchner (Valuation Products and Services) continued his strong rebuttal of some severe criticisms Aswath Damodaran (New York University Stern School of Business) made during a recent BVR webinar about certain inputs to the cost of capital (see prior coverage here).
Divorce Highlight: What’s in a judge’s mind?
In divorce matters, the most important audience is often the trier of fact, so anytime you can glean insights from them is time well spent.
Divorce Highlight: Forging the attorney-expert relationship
“One of the things I suggest to younger family lawyers is to make relationships with experts,” says Jay Fishman (Financial Research Associates) in a recent interview with Family Lawyer Magazine.
Simons v. Simons
The Nebraska Supreme Court allowed a fair value determination by the wife’s expert as the appropriate value for a divorce case and did not include any discounts that might apply in a fair market value determination. Much of the opinion dealt with the issue of a constructive trust, which the trial court determined results in a 50% ownership by the wife in the family business.
Nebraska Supreme Court Allows Fair Value Determination for Family-Owned Business and Does Not Allow Discounts
The Nebraska Supreme Court allowed a fair value determination by the wife’s expert as the appropriate value for a divorce case and did not include any discounts that might apply in a fair market value determination. Much of the opinion dealt with the issue of a constructive trust, which the trial court determined results in a 50% ownership by the wife in the family business.
Divorce Highlight: Something for everyone at the AAML/BVR Divorce Conference
The breadth of topics run from basic to complex at the 2022 AAML/BVR National Conference, which will be held on September 18-20 in Las Vegas.
Divorce spotlight: valuing a family business with complex ownership
When a family business caught up in divorce is not a simple 100% ownership, things can get complicated—from both a valuation and legal perspective.
New Toolkit for Passive Appreciation Takes Shape
BVR and Dr. Ashok Abbott (West Virginia University) are developing an automated tool and supporting documentation that embodies his peer-reviewed methodology for separating active from passive appreciation of business assets in a divorce context.
Appeals court affirms modified liquidation value in shareholder dispute
In a Michigan shareholder deadlock case, a special master recommended that a sale of shares from one shareholder to the other would yield more value than if the company were dissolved.
No deduction for tax in shareholder buyout
In a North Dakota partnership dissolution case, the defendants argued on appeal that the district court erred in its valuation.
BV News and Trends May 2022
A monthly roundup of key developments of interest to business valuation experts.
Ng v. Ng
The New York Supreme Court was asked to provide a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from conducting business that resulted in damage to the goodwill of a company it had sold in its entirety as part of a dissolution agreement. The court granted the “limited preliminary injunction.”
Pitsch v. Pitsch Holding Co.
In this shareholder deadlock litigation, the appellate court affirmed the decision of the trial court that the solution to the deadlock was to order a buyout of the plaintiffs’ stock by the defendants as opposed to a dissolution of the company. The appellate court also affirmed the use of a modified-liquidation value as providing a value that maximized the value to the individual shareholders.
Michigan Appeals Court Affirms Modified-Liquidation Value in a Shareholder Deadlock Litigation
In this shareholder deadlock litigation, the appellate court affirmed the decision of the trial court that the solution to the deadlock was to order a buyout of the plaintiffs’ stock by the defendants as opposed to a dissolution of the company. The appellate court also affirmed the use of a modified-liquidation value as providing a value that maximized the value to the individual shareholders.
BV News and Trends April 2022
A monthly roundup of key developments of interest to business valuation experts.