Can Defendant Disclaim Its Own Projections to Undo Expert’s Valuation?
Appeals court strikes down $28.2 million award to minority owner finding expert’s determination of the present value of the owner’s interest in income-producing properties relied on majority owner’s unreliable internal projections; although a party’s effo ...
One Expert’s Bad Data Undermine Another’s Damages Calculation
Fourth Circuit strikes down as “unsupportable” a $4 million lost profits award in a defamation suit; plaintiff’s first expert, a marketing professor, presented inadmissible growth projections that “ignore business realities”; as they formed the basis for ...
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tourre
Under Daubert, federal court curtails trial testimony of defendant’s expert finding he lacked the appropriate qualifications; in a case centering on collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), his financial economics expertise is not even “sufficiently proxim ...
MyGallons LLC v. U.S. Bankcorp
Fourth Circuit strikes down as “unsupportable” a $4 million lost profits award in a defamation suit; plaintiff’s first expert, a marketing professor, presented inadmissible growth projections that “ignore business realities”; as they formed the basis for ...
Citrin Holdings, LLC v. Minnis
Appeals court strikes down $28.2 million award to minority owner finding expert’s determination of the present value of the owner’s interest in income-producing properties relied on majority owner’s unreliable internal projections; although a party’s effo ...
Mississippi High Court Rejects Earnings Capacity Approach
State high court says loss of future earnings calculation does not determine value of injured or dead person, but the sum that replaces the money the victim would have earned; court rejects earnings capacity approach and mandates use of actual income.
Rebelwood Apts. RP, LP v. English
State high court says loss of future earnings calculation does not determine value of injured or dead person, but the sum that replaces the money the victim would have earned; court rejects earnings capacity approach and mandates use of actual income.
Lyondell Chem. Co. v. Occidental Chem. Corp.
In hazardous waste litigation, appeals court says expert’s Monte Carlo-based analysis to allocate cleanup costs met Daubert requirements; method is reliable in general and EPA endorsed Monte Carlo as tool for environmental risk assessment, court says.
Guang Dong v. ACI International, Inc.
In the absence of actual data, expert relies on emails and depositions to arrive at lost profits value.
Valuation 'Experts' Excluded as Unreliable Based on Numerous Errors in Methodology and Inability to Explain Conclusions
In this bankruptcy adversary proceeding, the trustees as plaintiffs sought to prove that the defendants—Bairnco Corp., Keene Corp., and the individual managers of the companies—had engaged in a series of fraudulent conveyances among subsidiaries to protect assets from the reach of asbestos claimants.
Lippe v. Bairnco Corp. (I)
In this bankruptcy adversary proceeding, the trustees as plaintiffs sought to prove that the defendants—Bairnco Corp., Keene Corp., and the individual managers of the companies—had engaged in a series of fraudulent conveyances among subsidiaries to protect assets from the reach of asbestos claimants.
ProtoComm Corp. v. Novell Advanced Services, Inc. et al.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania considered the admissibility of financial experts under Daubert.