Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tourre

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 18, 2013

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,843 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6211 Security Brokers, Dealers, and Flotation Companies
523110 Investment Banking and Securities Dealing
securities litigation
daubert, expert testimony, admissibility
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tourre
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87211
US
Federal Court
New York
United States District Court
Dwight M. Jaffee, Ira Wagner (plaintiff); Dr. Mukesh Bajaj (defendant)
Forrest

Summary

Under Daubert, federal court curtails trial testimony of defendant’s expert finding he lacked the appropriate qualifications; in a case centering on collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), his financial economics expertise is not even “sufficiently proxim ...
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tourre
PDF, Size: 6,747 KB

See Also

Court Upbraids Expert Who Discusses Subject Outside Area of Expertise

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2013

Under Daubert, federal court curtails trial testimony of defendant’s expert finding he lacked the appropriate qualifications; in a case centering on collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), his financial economics expertise is not even “sufficiently proxim ...

This article also appears in:
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar