Sternat v. Sternat

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 28, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,521 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7299 Miscellaneous Personal Services, NEC
561311 Employment Placement Agencies
marital dissolution/divorce
daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, fair market value (FMV), going concern, reliability, debt
Sternat v. Sternat
2015 Wisc. App. LEXIS 776
US
State Court
Wisconsin
Court of Appeals
Marcia Teal (husband); Kris Disbrow (wife)
Per Curiam

Summary

Appeals court says trial court’s decision to admit opinion of seasoned CPA expert who was not a credentialed business valuator was not error because valuation was a “non-issue” where evidence showed the indebted company was no longer a going concern.
Sternat v. Sternat
PDF, Size: 148 KB

See Also

Business Debt Renders Expert’s Lack of BV Credentials Inconsequential

Legal and Court Case Update
February 2016

Appeals court says trial court’s decision to admit opinion of seasoned CPA expert who was not a credentialed business valuator was not error because valuation was a “non-issue” where evidence showed the indebted company was no longer a going concern.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition