Short Takes and Tips From the Annual ASA Conference
There was a lot of interesting information to be found both inside the sessions and at the various networking events at the recent ASA Annual Conference in Portland, Ore.
BV News and Trends October 2024
A monthly roundup of key developments of interest to business valuation experts.
Expert accused of cherry-picking comps
In a New York case, a shareholder accused his partner of freezing him out, and he sued for damages.
TAKTL, LLC v. IWR, N. Am., LLC
This case, a breach of construction contract case, again provided a tutorial on the application of FRE 702 and the Daubert rules as to whether a witness qualified to testify. This case was post-Dec. 1, 2023, so the rule application was subject to the clarification of FRE 702 that became effective on that date. The court went in depth into the “fit” requirement, which was: Did the expert adequately apply testimony and a report that “fit” the case at hand, a requirement clarified by the Dec. 1, 2023, changes?
Court Decides on Motions to Exclude Under Post-Dec. 1, 2023, FRE 702
This case, a breach of construction contract case, again provided a tutorial on the application of FRE 702 and the Daubert rules as to whether a witness qualified to testify. This case was post-Dec. 1, 2023, so the rule application was subject to the clarification of FRE 702 that became effective on that date. The court went in depth into the “fit” requirement, which was: Did the expert adequately apply testimony and a report that “fit” the case at hand, a requirement clarified by the Dec. 1, 2023, changes?
Hetrick v. iink
The FRE 702 rules were modified in December 2023 to strengthen the qualifications for admittance of expert testimony. In this case, the Virginia U.S. District Court allowed the expert to testify and denied the Daubert motion to exclude the testimony. Among other things, the court found that the testimony was relevant to the case at hand.
U.S. District Court (Virginia) Denies Daubert Motion to Exclude Under New (2023) FRE 702
The FRE 702 rules were modified in December 2023 to strengthen the qualifications for admittance of expert testimony. In this case, the Virginia U.S. District Court allowed the expert to testify and denied the Daubert motion to exclude the testimony. Among other things, the court found that the testimony was relevant to the case at hand.
Yador v. Mowatt
The plaintiff’s damages expert was challenged in a Daubert motion in this case asserting that his use of historical data from two comparable companies as the basis for his revenue growth estimates amounted to “cherry picking” rather than using a survey or other independent method. The court allowed the testimony, noting that “‘any selection of comparable companies is inherently the product of expert judgment,’ and the record does not indicate that [the expert’s] judgment was biased or otherwise flawed.”
U.S. District Court (New York) Denies Daubert Challenge and Allows Testimony of DCF Method of Determining Damages
The plaintiff’s damages expert was challenged in a Daubert motion in this case asserting that his use of historical data from two comparable companies as the basis for his revenue growth estimates amounted to “cherry picking” rather than using a survey or other independent method. The court allowed the testimony, noting that “‘any selection of comparable companies is inherently the product of expert judgment,’ and the record does not indicate that [the expert’s] judgment was biased or otherwise flawed.”
Bombshell ruling on exclusion of damages experts in NFL case
“The Court agrees that [the experts’] testimonies based on their flawed methodologies should be excluded.” So wrote a federal judge in overturning the $4.7 billion verdict against the NFL in the Sunday Ticket antitrust case.
Power Panel: Trends and Issues in Business Valuation
The panel provides an overview of some of the hottest topics in the business valuation profession. Among the topics are: artificial intelligence; environmental, social, and governance (ESG); Department of Labor adequate compensation (ESOP) update; Daubert challenges; federal rules applicable to valuation/litigation experts; interesting case decisions/case law update; market multiples and trends in M discount for lack of marketability—trends and tools; lease accounting and business valuation; trending tax considerations; and cryptocurrency valuation issues. The Power Panel ...
Business as usual (so far) under tougher Rule 702
The first reported appellate decision to cite the new Rule 702 changes has appeared, but there’s no sea change to report.
Working Effectively With Attorneys (How to Be a Better Expert)
You’ve honed your valuation skills through education, training, and experience and have been educating clients about what their businesses have been worth for years. Now litigation counsel is asking you to educate judges and juries about the economics of a complex commercial dispute. The best way to be an effective expert, in addition to having those well-honed skills, is to gain an understanding of both the litigation forum and the general needs of counsel. This ...
New Rule 702 crackdown already impacting expert witnesses
Although they don’t officially go into effect until December 1, expert witnesses are already feeling the effects of the changes designed to strengthen Rule 702, which is the federal rule of evidence regarding testifying experts.
Expert Survives Daubert—Allowed to Testify as to Lost Business Value
The case dealt with two motions to preclude testimony of an expert witness as to the loss in value of the plaintiff’s business. The plaintiff was an environmental consulting firm allegedly injured as a result of the actions of certain employees including breach of their fiduciary duty. The court concluded that the witness may testify because his report was based on sufficient facts and data and he applied reliable principles to the facts of this case.
White Buffalo Env’t, Inc. v. Hungry Horse, LLC
The case dealt with two motions to preclude testimony of an expert witness as to the loss in value of the plaintiff’s business. The plaintiff was an environmental consulting firm allegedly injured as a result of the actions of certain employees including breach of their fiduciary duty. The court concluded that the witness may testify because his report was based on sufficient facts and data and he applied reliable principles to the facts of this case.
Business Valuation Case Law Yearbook, 2023 Edition
January 2023 PDF, Softcover (195 pages)
BVR (editor)
Business Valuation Resources, LLC
Appraisers Continue to Be Excluded Most Under Daubert, Per PwC Study
Under Daubert, appraisers were excluded more often in 2021 than any other type of financial expert witness, according to the latest edition of an annual PwC survey. Of the three most common financial experts (economists, accountants, and appraisers), appraisers had a 38% exclusion rate in 2021, followed by accountants (32%) and economists (27%). The article gives more insights into the survey and some ways to avoid a Daubert challenge.
Appraisers have highest exclusion rate under Daubert, per PwC study
Under Daubert, appraisers were excluded more often in 2021 than any other type of financial expert witness, according to the PwC survey, “Daubert Challenges to Financial Experts (2000-2021).”
Pinto v. Schinitsky
The Supreme Court of New York denied motions to dismiss assertions of excess compensation, payments to a consultant, and a salary paid to the defendant’s mother. The court also denied a Daubert motion to exclude the plaintiff’s expert on the reasonableness of compensation. The plaintiff’s expert, a CPA, was found to qualify even though reasonable compensation was not his competency for his practice.
New York Court Denies Claims in Three Damages Categories, Denies Daubert Motion to Exclude Experts
The Supreme Court of New York denied motions to dismiss assertions of excess compensation, payments to a consultant, and a salary paid to the defendant’s mother. The court also denied a Daubert motion to exclude the plaintiff’s expert on the reasonableness of compensation. The plaintiff’s expert, a CPA, was found to qualify even though reasonable compensation was not his competency for his practice.
Appraisers Have the Highest Exclusion Rate Under Daubert, Per PwC Study
A look at the latest study from PwC that analyzes challenges to financial expert witnesses (appraisers, accountants, economists, and others) under the Daubert standards from 2000 to 2020. Also, some classic advice on how to survive a Daubert challenge.
Business Valuation Case Law Yearbook, 2022 Edition
January 2022 PDF, Softcover (177 pages)
BVR (editor)
Business Valuation Resources, LLC
The legal coverage and in-depth analysis from the BVR legal team deliver lessons learned to help appraisers reach better and more defensible valuation conclusions. All the cases featured in this book impart important lessons about applicable legal principles, approved and discredited valuation methodology, and the act (and art) of presenting expert opinions. This must-have collection benefits both the generalist as well as the specialist.
Learn more >>
Discovery dispute over damages expert’s undisclosed work paper
In a discovery dispute, a federal court recently found the defendant had no duty to disclose to the opposing side its expert’s “intermediary” working paper that he used to prepare his damages calculation.
Patent Infringement Case Provides Judge With a Plethora of Daubert Challenges to Rule on
In this patent infringement case, the court ruled on a plethora of Daubert/Rule 702 challenges. The opinion provides an exhaustive list of Daubert-related issues that the court ruled on and provides a good tutorial on the real purposes of Daubert.