Split Maryland High Court Adopts Daubert for Testing Admissibility of Expert Testimony

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
August 28, 2020

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,556 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
expert testimony
daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, reliability, Frye
Rochkind v. Stevenson
2020 Md. LEXIS 414
US
State Court
Maryland
Court of Appeals
N/A
Getty

Summary

In a split decision featuring a long-running tort case that hinged on medical expert testimony regarding plaintiff’s claims of lead poising, divided state high court abandons two-channel approach, including Frye general acceptance test, for Daubert standard of admissibility of expert testimony.

See Also

Rochkind v. Stevenson

Full Text of Court Cases
August 28, 2020

In a split decision featuring a long-running tort case that hinged on medical expert testimony regarding plaintiff’s claims of lead poising, divided state high court abandons two-channel approach, including Frye general acceptance test, for Daubert standard of admissibility of expert testimony.