Slater v. Slater

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
December 29, 2010

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,109 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8041 Offices and Clinics of Chiropractors
621310 Offices of Chiropractors
marital dissolution/divorce
goodwill
Slater v. Slater
2010 WL 5356556 (Or. App.)
US
State Court
Oregon
Court of Appeals
Svendsen (wife); Holmer (husband)
Haselton

Summary

Oregon court adopts majority rule, finding it improper to predicate the value of a professional practice on a noncompete.

See Also

May a Divorce Court Presume Noncompete in Valuing a Professional Practice?

Legal and Court Case Update
March 2011

Oregon court adopts majority rule, finding it improper to predicate the value of a professional practice on a non-compete.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition
Business Valuation in Healthcare Case Law Compendium