Patel v. Patel

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
April 9, 2013

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,582 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7011 Hotels and Motels
721110 Hotels (except Casino Hotels) and Motels
marital dissolution/divorce
minority discount, debt, fractional interest
Patel v. Patel
2013 Va. App. LEXIS 110
US
State Court
Virginia
Court of Appeals
Mike Miller (wife); Michael Cummings, Larry Salzman (husband)
Humphreys

Summary

The appellate court finds that, performing the requisite intrinsic value review, the circuit court properly declined to include in its analysis any discounts the husband’s expert proposed to account for his fractional interest in companies owning hotels ...
Patel v. Patel
PDF, Size: 67 KB

See Also

Intrinsic Value Review Precludes Inclusion of Fractional Discounts

Legal and Court Case Update
July 2013

The appellate court finds that, performing the requisite intrinsic value review, the circuit court properly declined to include in its analysis any discounts the husband’s expert proposed to account for his fractional interest in companies owning hotels ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition