Expand the following panels for additional search options.

In re EM Lodgings, LLC

In granting creditor’s stay relief motion, court averages competing expert valuations and finds debtor has no equity in contested hotel; court says value gap is result of experts’ legitimate disagreements over hotel’s future performance as reflected in inputs for DCF-based analyses.

Court Accords Equal Weight to Competing DCF-Based Hotel Valuations

In granting creditor’s stay relief motion, court averages competing expert valuations and finds debtor has no equity in contested hotel; court says value gap is result of experts’ legitimate disagreements over hotel’s future performance as reflected in inputs for DCF-based analyses.

Appraiser Lacks Necessary Valuation Expertise, Dissent Says

Court majority finds appointed appraiser’s fair value determination meets legal requirements applicable to dissenting shareholder proceeding; dissent says appraiser lacked valuation expertise and ignored proper business valuations from parties’ experts.

Appraiser Lacks Necessary Valuation Expertise, Dissent Says

Court majority finds appointed appraiser’s fair value determination meets legal requirements applicable to dissenting shareholder proceeding; dissent says appraiser lacked valuation expertise and ignored proper business valuations from parties’ experts.

Shaffer v. Visaggio’s, Inc. (I)

Court majority finds appointed appraiser’s fair value determination meets legal requirements applicable to dissenting shareholder proceeding; dissent says appraiser lacked valuation expertise and ignored proper business valuations from parties’ experts.

Shaffer v. Visaggio’s, Inc. (II)

Court majority finds appointed appraiser’s fair value determination meets legal requirements applicable to dissenting shareholder proceeding; dissent says appraiser lacked valuation expertise and ignored proper business valuations from parties’ experts.

Taxpayer Scores Partial Success in Cal. Hotel Property Tax Suit

Appeals court says assessor’s version of income approach to determine hotel property taxes violates law because it does not identify, value, and exclude certain intangible assets; but management fee deduction largely captures hotel’s goodwill.

SHC Half Moon Bay, LLC v. County of San Mateo

Appeals court says assessor’s version of income approach to determine hotel property taxes violates law because it does not identify, value, and exclude certain intangible assets; but management fee deduction largely captures hotel’s goodwill.

Court Approves Debtor’s ‘Feasible, But Tight’ Plan With 6% Interest Rate

In Chapter 11 proceeding, Bankruptcy Court approves debtor hotel owner’s reorganization plan over objection of creditor that holds both secured and unsecured claims; applying the “Till formula approach,” the court decides the plan’s proposed 6% “cramdown”

Intrinsic Value Review Precludes Inclusion of Fractional Discounts

The appellate court finds that, performing the requisite intrinsic value review, the circuit court properly declined to include in its analysis any discounts the husband’s expert proposed to account for his fractional interest in companies owning hotels ...

In Re: LMR, LLC

In Chapter 11 proceeding, Bankruptcy Court approves debtor hotel owner’s reorganization plan over objection of creditor that holds both secured and unsecured claims; applying the “Till formula approach,” the court decides the plan’s proposed 6% “cramdown”

Patel v. Patel

The appellate court finds that, performing the requisite intrinsic value review, the circuit court properly declined to include in its analysis any discounts the husband’s expert proposed to account for his fractional interest in companies owning hotels ...

25-Year Battle Over Hard Rock Turns on Value of IP Assets

Court affirms value of Hard Rock Cafe IP assets based on testimony by the brand’s owner/entrepreneur rather than his two IP experts.

Okun v. Morton

Court affirms value of Hard Rock Cafe IP assets based on testimony by the brand’s owner/entrepreneur rather than his two IP experts.

Bankruptcy Court Prefers Adjusted Balance Sheet Test, Including FMV of Brand License

Bankruptcy court rejects “equitable solvency test” for gaming resort debtors, finding that adjusted balance sheet test, as supported by expert evidence, was the preferred test.

In re Premier Entertainment Biloxi LLC

Bankruptcy court rejects “equitable solvency test” for gaming resort debtors, finding that adjusted balance sheet test, as supported by expert evidence, was the preferred test.

Competing Valuations of Trump Casinos Determine Fate, Feasibility of Restructuring

Bankruptcy court considers key valuation evidence—including total enterprise value, cost of debt, debt service capacity, and capex/EBITDA proections—in confirmation of reorganization plan for Trump casinos.

In the Matter of TCI 2 Holdings, LLC

Bankruptcy court considers key valuation evidence—including total enterprise value, cost of debt, debt service capacity, and capex/EBITDA proections—in confirmation of reorganization plan for Trump casinos.

‘Splitting the Difference’ Is Not an Acceptable Valuation Method in Divorce

“Splitting the difference” between two disparate appraisals is not an acceptable valuation method in divorce.

Tax Consequences of Future Liquidation Not Considered

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision not to consider tax consequences of a future liquidation of a corporation because the tax liability would not arise as a result of the property division nor was it otherwise reasonably certain ...

In Re The Marriage of Robert E. Peterson v. Rhonda L. Peterson

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision not to consider tax consequences of a future liquidation of a corporation because the tax liability would not arise as a result of the property division nor was it otherwise reasonably certain ...

Augoshe v. Lehman

"Splitting the difference" between two disparate appraisals is not an acceptable valuation method in divorce.

Smith v Harrah's

On December 10, 2003, Shaun Smith got in his father’s truck—a 2002 F350 diesel-engine truck, with two front wheels and four rear wheels—and drove to Harrah’s casino in New Orleans. Over the course of an hour, he lost all of his money ($300–400) playing b ...

Bullet Land, Inc. v. Thal

Buy-sell agreement is not an enforceable arbitration clause, unless the agreement is specific on this point.

Contested Valuation of One Asset Is Moot Where All Transferred Assets Provide Reasonably Equivalent Value

One of the issues in this Chapter 11 bankruptcy case was whether James Jumer, as principal stockholder of the debtor corporation, Jumer’s Castle Lodge (JCL), had caused JCL to fraudulently transfer assets.

1 - 25 of 42 results