Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group (IV)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
December 15, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (9,118 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3674 Semiconductors and Related Devices
334413 Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing
intellectual property
daubert, economic damages & lost profits
Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group (IV)
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177647
US
Federal Court
Pennsylvania
United States District Court
Catherine M. Lawton (plaintiff); Creighton Hoffman (defendants)
Fischer

Summary

District court finds plaintiff’s expert qualified to testify to reasonable royalty calculation under Third Circuit’s liberal interpretation of Daubert despite lack of actual experience negotiating patent licenses; a hypothetical negotiation has no applica ...
Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group (IV)
PDF, Size: 410 KB

See Also

Lack of License Negotiation Experience Does Not Disqualify Expert

Legal and Court Case Update
March 2013

District court finds plaintiff’s expert qualified to testify to reasonable royalty calculation under Third Circuit’s liberal interpretation of Daubert despite lack of actual experience negotiating patent licenses; a hypothetical negotiation has no applica ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar