Lack of License Negotiation Experience Does Not Disqualify Expert

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 3
Legal and Court Case Update
March 2013

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (816 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3674 Semiconductors and Related Devices
334413 Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing
intellectual property
daubert, economic damages & lost profits
Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group (IV)
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177647
December 15, 2012
US
Federal Court
Pennsylvania
United States District Court
Catherine M. Lawton (plaintiff); Creighton Hoffman (defendants)
Fischer

Summary

District court finds plaintiff’s expert qualified to testify to reasonable royalty calculation under Third Circuit’s liberal interpretation of Daubert despite lack of actual experience negotiating patent licenses; a hypothetical negotiation has no applica ...

See Also

Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group (IV)

Full Text of Court Cases
December 15, 2012

District court finds plaintiff’s expert qualified to testify to reasonable royalty calculation under Third Circuit’s liberal interpretation of Daubert despite lack of actual experience negotiating patent licenses; a hypothetical negotiation has no applica ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 3
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition