Expand the following panels for additional search options.

In re Appraisal of Jarden Corp. (II)

Responding to petitioners’ motion for reargument, court concedes and corrects errors in court’s original DCF analysis but finds corrected DCF model still corroborates the original fair value determination; court affirms its reliance on unaffected market price as fair value indicator.

Court Says Corrected DCF Still Supports Original Fair Value Determination

Responding to petitioners’ motion for reargument, court concedes and corrects errors in court’s original DCF analysis but finds corrected DCF model still corroborates the original fair value determination; court affirms its reliance on unaffected market price as fair value indicator.

Unadjusted deal price best represents fair value, Court of Chancery says

In a statutory appraisal case featuring a publicly traded company, the Court of Chancery, after an exhaustive evaluation of the sale process, found the deal price was the best evidence of fair value.

In re Stillwater Mining Co. 2017 0385 JTL

In statutory appraisal of public company, court relies on deal price; presigning sale process was “suboptimal,” but post-signing market check was “effective”; there was an argument for upward adjustment to deal price based on an increase in the company’s value between merger announcement and deal closing.

Despite Less-Than-Optimal Sale Process, Court Relies on Deal Price for Fair Value

In statutory appraisal of public company, court relies on deal price; presigning sale process was “suboptimal,” but post-signing market check was “effective”; there was an argument for upward adjustment to deal price based on an increase in the company’s value between merger announcement and deal closing.

In re Appraisal of Columbia Pipeline Grp., Inc.

In statutory appraisal action featuring publicly traded company, court relies on deal price for fair value; although flawed, sale process, when compared to process in three key high court decisions endorsing deal price, does not undermine validity of deal price; no adjustment for synergies.

Court Endorses Unadjusted Deal Price as Fair Value Indicator Despite Flaws in Sale Process

In statutory appraisal action featuring publicly traded company, court relies on deal price for fair value; although flawed, sale process, when compared to process in three key high court decisions endorsing deal price, does not undermine validity of deal price; no adjustment for synergies.

Court of Chancery favors unaffected market price over other fair value indicators (Part 2)

When the Delaware Court of Chancery recently decided to rely on the unaffected market price for fair value, in a major statutory appraisal case, it provided an in-depth critique of the experts’ traditional valuation analyses, which valuators want to be familiar with.

Court of Chancery favors unaffected market price over other fair value indicators (Part 1)

In a freshly minted ruling, the Delaware Court of Chancery said the unaffected market price was the most reliable indicator of fair value in a big statutory fair value case.

In re Appraisal of Jarden Corp. (I)

Court finds record shows unaffected market price is best evidence of fair value; court says company expert’s efficient market analysis and event study provide strong support for use of market price; court’s own DCF analysis generates value close to market price, thus corroborating market price.

Court of Chancery Rules Unaffected Market Price Is Best Evidence of Fair Value

Court finds record shows unaffected market price is best evidence of fair value; court says company expert’s efficient market analysis and event study provide strong support for use of market price; court’s own DCF analysis generates value close to market price, thus corroborating market price.

Yukon Court Awards Premium in Fair Value Determination—A Comment on Carlock v. ExxonMobil Canada Holdings ULC

This case should resonate with all valuation experts involved in M&A work. The court labeled the fairness opinion as “inadequate,” emphasizing that the financial advisor was entitled to a “success fee.” The court also pointed to the lack of disclosure of the analysis underlying the advisor’s conclusion.

Global BVU News and Trends May 2019

Business valuation news from a global perspective.

BVU News and Trends April 2019

A monthly roundup of key developments of interest to business valuation experts.

Unequivocal ‘no’ to unaffected market price—Delaware Supreme Court strikes down Aruba Networks

In a sharp rebuke, the Delaware Supreme Court recently overturned the Court of Chancery’s confounding decision in the Aruba Networks statutory appraisal case to use the unaffected market price as the sole indicator of fair value.

Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. Aruba Networks, Inc. (Aruba III)

Delaware Supreme Court overturns Court of Chancery’s fair value determination based on unaffected market price and awards petitioners deal price minus synergies as determined by company; trial court’s analysis rested on “inapt” agency-costs theory and raised due process and fairness concerns.

Delaware Supreme Court Reproves Chancery’s Use of Unaffected Market Price in Aruba

Delaware Supreme Court overturns Court of Chancery’s fair value determination based on unaffected market price and awards petitioners deal price minus synergies as determined by company; trial court’s analysis rested on “inapt” agency-costs theory and raised due process and fairness concerns.

Global BV News: Evolution of legal valuations in Germany

A study from I-ADVISE describes the evolution of valuation practices in Germany related to squeeze-outs, control and profit-and-loss transfer agreements, mergers, and legal changes between 2010 and 2018.

Global BV News: Valuations slanted for squeezeouts in Finland

A paper examines the choices of valuation methods and their association with redemption prices in disputes concerning private-company squeezeouts.

Kendall Hoyd & Silver v. Trussway Holdings

Delaware Court of Chancery finds DCF analysis is the best way to achieve fair value in a statutory appraisal case arising out of a contested merger; court’s analysis leans heavily on company expert’s analysis regarding contested inputs, including projections, beta, and terminal value.

Court Chooses DCF to Determine Fair Value in ‘Straightforward’ Appraisal Case

Delaware Court of Chancery finds DCF analysis is the best way to achieve fair value in a statutory appraisal case arising out of a contested merger; court’s analysis leans heavily on company expert’s analysis regarding contested inputs, including projections, beta, and terminal value.

Ongoing saga of New York’s out-of-step position on DLOM

We’ve followed the continuing tale of New York’s inconsistent position with respect to the discount for lack of marketability in fair value proceedings (for example, see this coverage).

Contentious Lund buyout and fair value rulings survive appeal

The Minnesota appeals court recently upheld the district court’s buyout order and fair value determination related to a well-known local grocery store chain, Lunds & Byerlys.

Paper says Delaware blundered in Dell and DFC Global

A paper analyzes what it calls “critical mistakes” in two Delaware Supreme Court decisions concerning appraisal rights.

BVU News and Trends January 2019

A monthly roundup of key developments of interest to business valuation experts.

51 - 75 of 172 results