In re Appraisal of Jarden Corp. (I)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
July 19, 2019

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (34,084 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6719 Offices of Holding Companies, NEC
551112 Offices of Other Holding Companies
shareholder dissent/oppression
expert testimony, size premium, weighted average cost of capital (WACC), cash flow, discounted cash flow (DCF), event study, statutory appraisal, multiple, synergy, equity risk premium (ERP), market value, comparable companies method, efficient market, unaffected market price
In re Appraisal of Jarden Corp. (I)
2019 Del. Ch. LEXIS 271
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Dr. Mark Zmijewski (petitioners); Dr. Glenn Hubbard (company/respondents)
Slights

Summary

Court finds record shows unaffected market price is best evidence of fair value; court says company expert’s efficient market analysis and event study provide strong support for use of market price; court’s own DCF analysis generates value close to market price, thus corroborating market price.
Jarden Appraisal
PDF, Size: 1,088 KB

See Also

Court of Chancery Rules Unaffected Market Price Is Best Evidence of Fair Value

Court Case Digests
July 19, 2019

Court finds record shows unaffected market price is best evidence of fair value; court says company expert’s efficient market analysis and event study provide strong support for use of market price; court’s own DCF analysis generates value close to market price, thus corroborating market price.