Expand the following panels for additional search options.

Federal Circuit Affirms $95 Million Patent Award Based on Price Erosion Theory

Federal Circuit finds jury’s lost profits and reasonable royalty award based on plaintiffs’ price erosion theory is not excessive; sufficient evidence supported expert’s “but for” damages model calculating prices two to three times as much as the prices t ...

USSC rules that human genes are not patentable

Ericsson Inc. v. D-Link Corp. (I)

In IEEE 802.11n standard infringement case, district court denies defendants’ Daubert motion finding plaintiff expert’s damage model based on per unit royalty on sales of accused products included two levels of apportionment to properly capture only the v ...

SSL Services, LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc.

District court denies defendants’ post-trial challenge to $10 million jury award finding the fact that the patent assignee at the time of the hypothetical negotiation was worth less than its single patent-in-suit does not control the assessment of patent ...

Apple is sued again for patent infringement

SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (III)

Federal Circuit finds jury’s lost profits and reasonable royalty award based on plaintiffs’ price erosion theory is not excessive; sufficient evidence supported expert’s “but for” damages model calculating prices two to three times as much as the prices t ...

IP value is finally a boardroom discussion

101 - 125 of 209 results