SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (III)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 13, 2013

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,514 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3612 Power, Distribution, and Specialty Transformers
335311 Power, Distribution, and Specialty Transformer Manufacturing
intellectual property
patent infringement, economic damages & lost profits, reasonable royalty
SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (III)
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5051
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Brett Reed (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Rader

Summary

Federal Circuit finds jury’s lost profits and reasonable royalty award based on plaintiffs’ price erosion theory is not excessive; sufficient evidence supported expert’s “but for” damages model calculating prices two to three times as much as the prices t ...
Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (Synqor III)
PDF, Size: 215 KB

See Also

Federal Circuit Affirms $95 Million Patent Award Based on Price Erosion Theory

Legal and Court Case Update
July 2013

Federal Circuit finds jury’s lost profits and reasonable royalty award based on plaintiffs’ price erosion theory is not excessive; sufficient evidence supported expert’s “but for” damages model calculating prices two to three times as much as the prices t ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Second Edition