RERI Holdings I, LLC v. Comm’r
Tax Court denies IRS’s summary judgment motion to disallow claimed charitable deduction arguing taxpayer’s appraiser improperly valued donated interest in LLC using present-value Section 7520 tables and failed to submit “qualified appraisal.”
Estate of Adell v. Commissioner
Tax court disapproves of estate’s “conflicting expert reports” as to value of decedent’s 100% interest in a C corp. but ultimately adopts estate’s DCF valuation, finding its treatment of personal goodwill is more credible than the IRS’s approach.
Buyout Agreement Short-Circuits Court’s Scrutiny of Appraisals
Court says determination of repurchase price of departing partner’s stake is subject to operating agreement giving defendants absolute control over valuation; absent bad faith conduct, court declines to scrutinize appraisals underlying buyout offer.
Marshall v. Marshall (I)
Appeals court says parties’ agreement is ambiguous as to whether distributions related to husband’s ownership in S corp. are includable in alimony and child support calculation; on remand, trial court must determine what income parties meant when specifying use of pretax income from employment.
Courts Agree Reasonable Compensation Is Sound Method for Calculating Spousal Support in S Corp Context
Appeals court says parties’ agreement is ambiguous as to whether distributions related to husband’s ownership in S corp. are includable in alimony and child support calculation; on remand, trial court must determine what income parties meant when specifying use of pretax income from employment.
Courts Decry Expert’s Failure to Explore Different Ways to Develop FMV
Appeals court affirms trial court’s valuation of medical practices based on buyout provisions where wife’s expert made no attempt to ascertain businesses’ FMV by any other valuation method.
Court Pans Valuation Based on Expert’s Fiction, Not Fact
High court rejects valuation of husband’s interest in closely held company where wife’s expert transformed it from one owned by four people into one managed by one person to increase its overall value.
Taubman v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Appeals court affirms trial court’s discounting for lack of control and marketability in valuing oil and gas interests where trust’s ownership in interests was fractional and indirect and there was testimony regarding IRS’s estate tax discount rates.
MacDermid Printing Solutions, Inc. v Cortron Corp.
Court finds damages expert’s use of destruction of business method is not improper despite a four-year gap between the alleged offending conduct and the company’s demise, and it does not render his calculation inadmissible under Daubert.
DCF Model Proves Unreliable Tool for Ascertaining Cost Basis
Court finds numerous problematic assumptions make plaintiff expert’s DCF model unreliable indicator of FMV of thrift’s branching right; without this value, plaintiff is unable to establish the right’s cost basis and support its tax refund claim.
Valuing a Hypothetical Asset Renders Appraisal ‘Meaningless’
Tax Court says petitioner failed IRC’s section 170 requirements for charitable contribution deduction because his claim leaned on appraisals of the donated building that were not qualified; neither valuation was timely or established the asset’s fair mark ...
Leone v. Owsley
Court says determination of repurchase price of departing partner’s stake is subject to operating agreement giving defendants absolute control over valuation; absent bad faith conduct, court declines to scrutinize appraisals underlying buyout offer.
Creditors’ Valuation Spoils Diminution in Value Claim
Ruling on the adequate protection claim of junior secured noteholders (JSNs) in a complex bankruptcy proceeding, court finds JSNs failed to prove a diminution in the value of their cash collateral during case; flawed assumptions and inputs invalidate the ...
Ward v. Ward
High court rejects valuation of husband’s interest in closely held company where wife’s expert transformed it from one owned by four people into one managed by one person to increase its overall value.
Burstein v. Burstein
Appeals court affirms trial court’s valuation of medical practices based on buyout provisions where wife’s expert made no attempt to ascertain businesses’ FMV by any other valuation method.
Washington Mutual, Inc. v. United States
Court finds numerous problematic assumptions make plaintiff expert’s DCF model unreliable indicator of FMV of thrift’s branching right; without this value, plaintiff is unable to establish the right’s cost basis and support its tax refund claim.
Tax Court Foils ‘End Run’ Around Expert Rules
Tax Court rejects taxpayer’s attempt to place in evidence a new appraisal regarding the decedent’s interest in an LLC whose principal asset was real estate by way of stipulation, finding he failed to qualify the appraiser as an expert and did not present ...
Alli v. Commissioner
Tax Court says petitioner failed IRC’s section 170 requirements for charitable contribution deduction because his claim leaned on appraisals of the donated building that were not qualified; neither valuation was timely or established the asset’s fair mark ...
Court Rejects Expert’s Regression Equation to Determine DLOM
In determining the fair market value of a revocable trust’s interest in an LLC, the Tax Court adopts the IRS expert’s marketability discount and valuation; he rightly assumed it was reasonably foreseeable at the time of the decedent’s death that the trust ...
Sparks v. Sparks
Appellate court upholds dated valuation husband’s expert performed of veterinary hospital two years prior to trial, where it informed proposed sale of minority interest in business to willing buyer and asset was not volatile; there is no “artificial cut-o ...
Estate of Tanenblatt v. Commissioner
Tax Court rejects taxpayer’s attempt to place in evidence a new appraisal regarding the decedent’s interest in an LLC whose principal asset was real estate by way of stipulation, finding he failed to qualify the appraiser as an expert and did not present ...
In re Residential Capital, LLC
Ruling on the adequate protection claim of junior secured noteholders (JSNs) in a complex bankruptcy proceeding, court finds JSNs failed to prove a diminution in the value of their cash collateral during case; flawed assumptions and inputs invalidate the ...
What ‘FMV’? Bankruptcy Court Restricts Car Dealer’s Damages
Bankruptcy court finds car dealer’s claim for fair market value of its franchise based on state law dealer statute is invalid under Bankruptcy Code; expert testimony only supports past lost profit damages for cars and parts and accessories in stock at tim ...