Expand the following panels for additional search options.

25% Rule Does Not ‘Irretrievably Damage’ Royalty Analysis

Federal Circuit finds use of discarded 25% rule of thumb does not “irretrievably damage” expert’s royalty analysis because he also used acceptable alternative method, substantially supporting jury’s award.

Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. William Demant Holding A/S

Federal Circuit finds use of discarded 25% rule of thumb does not “irretrievably damage” expert’s royalty analysis because he also used acceptable alternative method, substantially supporting jury’s award.

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH v. David W. TOWNSEND

In this action, the plaintiff University of Pittsburgh ("University") alleges that the defendants David W. Townsend, Ronald Nutt, CTI Molecular Imaging, Inc., and CTI PET Systems, Inc. (collectively, the "defendants"), subverted and m ...

3 results