Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. William Demant Holding A/S

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 12, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,789 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3842 Orthopedic, Prosthetic, and Surgical Appliances and Supplies
334510 Electromedical and Electrotherapeutic Apparatus Manufacturing
intellectual property
Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. William Demant Holding A/S
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21200
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Terry L. Musika (plaintiff); Jonathan D. Putnam (defendants)
Rader

Summary

Federal Circuit finds use of discarded 25% rule of thumb does not “irretrievably damage” expert’s royalty analysis because he also used acceptable alternative method, substantially supporting jury’s award.
Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. William Demant Holding A/S
PDF, Size: 139 KB

See Also

25% Rule Does Not ‘Irretrievably Damage’ Royalty Analysis

Legal and Court Case Update
January 2013

Federal Circuit finds use of discarded 25% rule of thumb does not “irretrievably damage” expert’s royalty analysis because he also used acceptable alternative method, substantially supporting jury’s award.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition