California Appellate Court Affirms That the Marital Settlement Agreement Should Not Be Set Aside for Alleged Inadequate Disclosures
The husband and wife entered into a settlement agreement as to their divorce that was included in the trial court’s judgment of dissolution. The wife thereafter asked the trial court to set the agreement aside due to, among other things, the husband’s failure to disclose his ownership interests in various businesses. The appellate court found the evidence for her motion(s) to be lacking and affirmed the trial court.
In re Hettinga
The husband and wife entered into a settlement agreement as to their divorce that was included in the trial court’s judgment of dissolution. The wife thereafter asked the trial court to set the agreement aside due to, among other things, the husband’s failure to disclose his ownership interests in various businesses. The appellate court found the evidence for her motion(s) to be lacking and affirmed the trial court.
James R. Johnson v. Hamilton Medical Group
The Louisiana Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit, affirmed the denial of past lost earnings to a self-employed person because they were inadequately documented.
Court Recognizes Stockholder Agreement, Allows for Minority Iinterest Discount
On appeal by the husband, Ralph Stayer, and cross appeal by the wife, Catharine Stayer, the issues are: (1) Catharine's challenge to the valuation of Ralph's Johnsonville Foods, Inc. stock ...
Stayer v. Stayer
At issue is the valuation of husband's Johnsonville Foods, Inc., stock and the credibility and weight given to the experts.