Bobby Fisher, Inc. v. Cerveceria Costa Rica, S.A.
Court rejects plaintiff’s lost profits approach to quantify diminished value of business due to loss of beer brands because of “untenable suppositions”; defendant’s income-based calculation was “only rational” approach offered in this case, court says.
LightLab Imaging, Inc. v. Axsun Technologies, Inc.
Appeals court finds trial court had discretion under Daubert to exclude expert testimony on future lost profits where expert used the “first mover advantage” as part of his DCF analysis to quantify damages and ended up with an unreliable method.
Dominion Liquid Technologies, LLC v. GT Beverage Co., LLC
In contract dispute, court finds defendant expert’s testimony regarding offset value of new equipment plaintiff installed in reliance on contract is relevant under Daubert even though expert fails to state precise monetary benefit to plaintiff.
MacDermid Printing Solutions, Inc. v Cortron Corp.
Court finds damages expert’s use of destruction of business method is not improper despite a four-year gap between the alleged offending conduct and the company’s demise, and it does not render his calculation inadmissible under Daubert.
Roll-Rite, LLC v Shur-Co, LLC
Expert’s use of Panduit to show causation and reconstruct hypothetical market for lost profits analysis satisfies Daubert, court says; expert showed demand for patented product and provided method for calculating actual damages on per-unit basis.
Expert Trips Over Fundamental Damage Concepts
Court strikes rebuttal testimony under Daubert, where expert admitted he lacked an understanding of the damages concepts central to the opposing expert’s calculation, failed to identify a specific method for his conclusions, and included his clients’ tria ...
‘Undue’ Scrutiny of Expert’s Data Triggers Erroneous Exclusion
Seventh Circuit overturns district court’s decision to exclude plaintiff expert’s business loss calculation, finding the lower court “exercised its role as gatekeeper under Daubert with too much vigor” when it “unduly” scrutinized the quality of the exper ...
Orthoflex, Inc. v. Thermotek, Inc.
Court strikes rebuttal testimony under Daubert, where expert admitted he lacked an understanding of the damages concepts central to the opposing expert’s calculation, failed to identify a specific method for his conclusions, and included his clients’ tria ...
Expert’s Anemic Analysis Imperils Damage Calculation
Appellate court affirms pretrial decision to strike economist expert’s opinion as to business loss under Rule 702; although the trial court erred when it found the expert unqualified to perform a business valuation, it was right to find his calculations ...
May Expert Offer Plaintiff’s Loss Calculation as His Own?
In Daubert challenge, court finds expert testimony that validates, without any independent analysis, potential loss projections created by plaintiff’s executives is irrelevant and unreliable; the expert failed to examine the underlying assumptions and any ...
Manpower, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania (III)
Seventh Circuit overturns district court’s decision to exclude plaintiff expert’s business loss calculation, finding the lower court “exercised its role as gatekeeper under Daubert with too much vigor” when it “unduly” scrutinized the quality of the exper ...
One Expert’s Bad Data Undermine Another’s Damages Calculation
Fourth Circuit strikes down as “unsupportable” a $4 million lost profits award in a defamation suit; plaintiff’s first expert, a marketing professor, presented inadmissible growth projections that “ignore business realities”; as they formed the basis for ...