‘Undue’ Scrutiny of Expert’s Data Triggers Erroneous Exclusion

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 20 No. 2
Legal and Court Case Update
February 2014

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,418 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6300 Insurance carriers
524126 Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Carriers
economic damages & lost profits
damages, daubert, expert testimony, federal rules of evidence (FRE), business interruption loss
Manpower, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania (III)
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20959
October 16, 2013
US
Federal Court
7th Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Eric Sullivan (plaintiff); unknown (defendant)
Tharp

Summary

Seventh Circuit overturns district court’s decision to exclude plaintiff expert’s business loss calculation, finding the lower court “exercised its role as gatekeeper under Daubert with too much vigor” when it “unduly” scrutinized the quality of the exper ...

See Also

Manpower, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania (III)

Full Text of Court Cases
October 16, 2013

Seventh Circuit overturns district court’s decision to exclude plaintiff expert’s business loss calculation, finding the lower court “exercised its role as gatekeeper under Daubert with too much vigor” when it “unduly” scrutinized the quality of the exper ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 20 No. 2
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition