Weinman v. Crowley (In re Blair)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 2, 2018

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (10,406 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
bankruptcy
daubert, expert testimony, fair value, asset approach, fair market value (FMV), rule 702, solvency, relevant, book value, valuation date, balance sheet, chapter 7 bankruptcy, debtor, expert qualifications
Weinman v. Crowley (In re Blair)
2018 Bank. LEXIS 2281
US
Federal Court
Federal
United States Bankruptcy Court
Mark Dennis (trustee/plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
McNamara

Summary

Bankruptcy Court excludes as unreliable and irrelevant expert’s solvency opinion and balance sheet; court says expert lacked the facts and data necessary to enact his chosen method and “failed in numerous ways” to reliably apply the facts and data in accordance with the selected method.
Weinman v. Crowley
PDF, Size: 208 KB

See Also

Lack of Facts and Data Render Expert’s Fair Value Balance Sheet Not Helpful

Court Case Digests
August 2, 2018

Bankruptcy Court excludes as unreliable and irrelevant expert’s solvency opinion and balance sheet; court says expert lacked the facts and data necessary to enact his chosen method and “failed in numerous ways” to reliably apply the facts and data in accordance with the selected method.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition