Volterra Semiconductor Corp. v. Primarion, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 24, 2013

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (19,577 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3674 Semiconductors and Related Devices
334413 Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing
intellectual property
lost profits, patent infringement, daubert, expert testimony, causation
Volterra Semiconductor Corp. v. Primarion, Inc.
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163970
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
Michael J. Wagner, Dr. Christine Siegwarth Meyer (plaintiff); Dr. Matthew R. Lynde, Jeffrey L. Baliban (defendant)
Spero

Summary

In a patent case, in a pretrial ruling, the court finds the plaintiff cannot claim direct harm for lost revenues its foreign subsidiary sustained because of the defendants’ infringement by relying on expert testimony that equated the value of the injury d ...
Volterra Semiconductor Corp. v. Primarion, Inc.
PDF, Size: 1,095 KB

See Also

Expert’s ‘Dollar-for-Dollar’ Damages Theory Short of Factual Support

Legal and Court Case Update
January 2014

In a patent case, in a pretrial ruling, the court finds the plaintiff cannot claim direct harm for lost revenues its foreign subsidiary sustained because of the defendants’ infringement by relying on expert testimony that equated the value of the injury d ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar