Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. (I)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
January 16, 2014

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,661 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7371 Computer Programming Services
541511 Custom Computer Programming Services
intellectual property
patent infringement, daubert, expert testimony, discount, georgia-pacific, reasonable royalty, lump sum license
Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. (I)
2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5836
US
Federal Court
Delaware
United States District Court
Creighton Hoffman (plaintiff); Christopher Martinez (defendant)
Andrews

Summary

Court says no requirement exists that expert’s royalty analysis only consider transactions that are both technologically and economically comparable and finds Daubert allows for a reasonable royalty calculation based on a valuation of patent in suit embed ...
Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. (I)
PDF, Size: 278 KB

See Also

May Expert Use Valuation With Unknown Discounts for Royalty Analysis?

Legal and Court Case Update
April 2014

Court says no requirement exists that expert’s royalty analysis only consider transactions that are both technologically and economically comparable and finds Daubert allows for a reasonable royalty calculation based on a valuation of patent in suit embed ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Second Edition