Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. (III)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
July 13, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,065 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7372 Prepackaged Software
511210 Software Publishers
intellectual property
daubert, economic damages & lost profits, entire market value rule (EMVR)
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. (III)
2011 WL 2728317 (S.D. Calif.)
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
Raymond Sims (plaintiff)
Huff

Summary

Federal district court precludes expert’s patent infringement damages under Uniloc standard for failing 1) to establish the patented software as the basis for consumer demand of Microsoft Outlook; or, 2) specifically apportioning damages between the paten ...
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. (III)
PDF, Size: 200 KB

See Also

Expert Must Apportion Patent Damages Under Entire Market Value Rule

Legal and Court Case Update
October 2011

Federal district court precludes expert’s patent infringement damages under Uniloc standard for failing: (1) to establish the patented software as the basis for consumer demand of Microsoft Outlook; or (2) specifically apportioning damages between the paten ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar