In re Marriage of Kirkendoll

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 4, 2016

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,839 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5271 Mobile Home Dealers
453930 Manufactured (Mobile) Home Dealers
marital dissolution/divorce
goodwill, expert testimony, going concern, valuation methods, double counting
In re Marriage of Kirkendoll
2016 Wash. App. LEXIS 2357
US
State Court
Washington
Court of Appeals
Devon Brown (husband); none (wife)
Johanson

Summary

Court says awarding husband family business plus business income taken out to make business-related payments does not fit “notion of an impermissible ‘double dip’”; business was not a diminishing asset, and wife did not receive either of those assets.
In re Marriage of Kirkendoll
PDF, Size: 167 KB

See Also

Double-Dip Claim Fails to Resonate With Appeals Court

Court Case Digests
October 4, 2016

Court says awarding husband family business plus business income taken out to make business-related payments does not fit “notion of an impermissible ‘double dip’”; business was not a diminishing asset, and wife did not receive either of those assets.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition