Horne-Ballard v. Ballard

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 1, 2020

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (10,502 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, calculation of value, marital asset, distribution, opinion of value, valuation engagement
Horne-Ballard v. Ballard
2020 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 50
US
State Court
Alabama
Court of Civil Appeals
Michelle Parks (husband); J. Wray Pearce (wife)
Thompson

Summary

In divorce case, Alabama appeals court upholds trial court’s admission of calculation of value from qualified expert for medical practice; appeals court agrees with lower court that objections to methodology go toward weight and expert’s credibility; court lets earlier Rohling decision stand.
Horne-Ballard v. Ballard
PDF, Size: 166 KB

See Also

Alabama Appeals Court Affirms Calculation of Value Is Admissible and Lets Rohling Stand

Court Case Digests
May 1, 2020

In divorce case, Alabama appeals court upholds trial court’s admission of calculation of value from qualified expert for medical practice; appeals court agrees with lower court that objections to methodology go toward weight and expert’s credibility; court lets earlier Rohling decision stand.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition