Alabama Appeals Court Affirms Calculation of Value Is Admissible and Lets Rohling Stand

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
May 1, 2020
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, calculation of value, marital asset, distribution, opinion of value, valuation engagement

Horne-Ballard v. Ballard
2020 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 50
US
State Court
Alabama
Court of Civil Appeals
Michelle Parks (husband); J. Wray Pearce (wife)
Thompson

Summary

In divorce case, Alabama appeals court upholds trial court’s admission of calculation of value from qualified expert for medical practice; appeals court agrees with lower court that objections to methodology go toward weight and expert’s credibility; court lets earlier Rohling decision stand.

See Also

Horne-Ballard v. Ballard

In divorce case, Alabama appeals court upholds trial court’s admission of calculation of value from qualified expert for medical practice; appeals court agrees with lower court that objections to methodology go toward weight and expert’s credibility; court lets earlier Rohling decision stand.