Graspa Consulting v. United Nat’l Ins. Co.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
November 17, 2020

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (6,890 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5812 Eating and Drinking Places
722511 Full-Service Restaurants
economic damages & lost profits
damages, insurance, business interruption loss, coronavirus, COVID-19, business interruption, physical loss
Graspa Consulting v. United Nat’l Ins. Co.
2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215976
US
Federal Court
Florida
United States District Court
N/A
Torres

Summary

In this business interruption case resulting from mandatory shutdowns to control COVID-19, the court dismisses plaintiff’s (a restaurant chain owner/operator) claims against insurance company; plaintiffs did not incur (nor did it assert) physical damages to premises as required by the terms of the insurance policy.
Graspa Consulting v. United Natl Ins Co
PDF, Size: 240 KB

See Also

In COVID-19 Business Interruption Case, Court Grants Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claim for COVID-19-Related Losses

Court Case Digests
November 17, 2020

In this business interruption case resulting from mandatory shutdowns to control COVID-19, the court dismisses plaintiff’s (a restaurant chain owner/operator) claims against insurance company; plaintiffs did not incur (nor did it assert) physical damages to premises as required by the terms of the insurance policy.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition