In COVID-19 Business Interruption Case, Court Grants Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claim for COVID-19-Related Losses

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
November 17, 2020
5812 Eating and Drinking Places
722511 Full-Service Restaurants
economic damages & lost profits
damages, insurance, business interruption loss, coronavirus, COVID-19, business interruption, physical loss

Graspa Consulting v. United Nat’l Ins. Co.
2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215976
US
Federal Court
Florida
United States District Court
N/A
Torres

Summary

In this business interruption case resulting from mandatory shutdowns to control COVID-19, the court dismisses plaintiff’s (a restaurant chain owner/operator) claims against insurance company; plaintiffs did not incur (nor did it assert) physical damages to premises as required by the terms of the insurance policy.

See Also

Graspa Consulting v. United Nat’l Ins. Co.

In this business interruption case resulting from mandatory shutdowns to control COVID-19, the court dismisses plaintiff’s (a restaurant chain owner/operator) claims against insurance company; plaintiffs did not incur (nor did it assert) physical damages to premises as required by the terms of the insurance policy.