Carney v. Carney

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
July 11, 2017

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,797 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4213 Trucking, Except Local
484230 Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Long-Distance
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, income approach, asset approach, liquidation, equitable distribution, income tax, marital property, asset transfer
Carney v. Carney
2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 509
US
State Court
Pennsylvania
Superior Court
David E. Coffman (business valuation, wife), Barry Rudiger (asset valuation, wife); unknown (husband)
Stevens

Summary

Reviewing court says in valuing owner spouse’s auto transport business and performing equitable distribution analysis, trial court erred when it refused to consider tax effects of potential sale of business before assigning asset to owner; case remanded.
Carney v. Carney
PDF, Size: 137 KB

See Also

Tax Effects Are Relevant to Equitable Distribution Analysis

Court Case Digests
July 11, 2017

Reviewing court says in valuing owner spouse’s auto transport business and performing equitable distribution analysis, trial court erred when it refused to consider tax effects of potential sale of business before assigning asset to owner; case remanded.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition