Michael Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 17, 2008

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (4,096 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3944 Games, Toys, and Children's Vehicles, Except Dolls and Bicycles
339930 Doll, Toy, and Game Manufacturing
intellectual property
patent infringement, daubert, georgia-pacific, reasonable royalty
Michael Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.
2008 WL 717741 (U.S. Dist.)
US
Federal Court
Rhode Island
United States District Court
Neil N. Lapidus (plaintiff); Barry Sussman (defendant)
Smith

Summary

Expert's methodology, credentials, called into question in reasonable royalty valuation.
Bowling v. Hasbro
PDF, Size: 682 KB

See Also

Court Questions Expert’s Objectivity, Methodology in Reasonable Royalty Valuation

Legal and Court Case Update
May 2008

Expert's methodology, credentials, called into question in reasonable royalty valuation.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar