Berg v. Young

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 2, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (4,338 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5511 Motor Vehicle Dealers (New and Used)
441120 Used Car Dealers
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, passive appreciation, equitable distribution, separate property, personal property, real property, active appreciation
Berg v. Young
2015 Fla. App., LEXIS 13077
US
State Court
Florida
Court of Appeal
Unknown (wife); unknown (husband)
Levine

Summary

Appeals court says trial court erred in interpreting prenuptial agreement but reached correct result when it rejected wife’s claim to enhanced value of husband’s separate interest in car dealership by ruling appreciation in value was passive, not active.
Berg v. Young
PDF, Size: 148 KB

See Also

Different Ways to Find No Claim to Enhanced Value of Nonmarital Asset

Legal and Court Case Update
December 2015

Appeals court says trial court erred in interpreting prenuptial agreement but reached correct result when it rejected wife’s claim to enhanced value of husband’s separate interest in car dealership by ruling appreciation in value was passive, not active.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition