Bornemann v. Bornemann
At issue is whether the trial court properly determined that certain stock options were available for equitable distribution.
Green v. Green
Issues were whether the trial court erred in allowing spaced payments while not allowing interest for lost value and failing to value husband's interests at the date of the final hearing.
Court Appoints Independent Appraiser Due to Inadequate Evidence
At issue is husband's interest in a closely held company for marital dissolution purposes.
Ohio appellate court judges trial court's combined valuation to be flawed
Husband appeals the value of a 50% interest in Gest Farms, a dairy farm partnership.
Wife says court erred in valuing husband's stock options
Wife contends that the trial court erred in calculating the value of husband's employee stock options in Eli Lilly & Co.
Lack of Reliable Evidence Results in Remand for Value
Both husband and wife appeal the equitable distribution order issued by the trial court. Wife contends that the trial court erred in valuing the husband's two businesses, Gateway II and High ...
In re Marriage of Dieger
At issue is the valuation of twenty shares of husband's stock.
Gest v. Gest
Issue is wether Gest Farms was properly added as a party to marital dissolution, and whether trial court erred in combining two appraisals in valuing Gest Farms.
Shooltz v. Shooltz
Issues were the valuation of husband's businesses, the striking of wife's valuation expert, and the consideration of tax consequences.
Knotts v. Knotts
At issue is the valuation of husband's stock in Eli Lilly and Company.
Dahill v. Dahill
Issue was the value of husband's interest in a closely held company, and whether the shareholder agreement value was controlling.
Business Valued at Less Than Half of Annual Salary Withdrawn From Enterprise
Wife appeals from the trial judge's equitable distribution decision, contending that no evidence supported the trial judge's determination that her clothing business was worth $140,000. Wife ...
Seiler v. Seiler
One issue in this case was the value of goodwill in an insurance agency.
In re Marriage of Dieterle
One issue in this case was the inclusion of accounts receivable, patient charts and goodwill into the value of husbands medical practice.
Value of a Professional Practice Is Not Diminished by the Professional’s Outstanding Student Loans
The Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, reversed a lower court's valuation of a medical practice at zero over expert testimony.
Court of Appeals Determines Whether an Interest in a Corporation Was Properly Valued
Husband contests the trial court's valuation of his 65% interest in Advanced Integrated Technology, a computer consulting business.
Husband Argues That Valuation Should Be Reduced by Personal Income Tax Payments
On appeal, husband argues that the trial court incorrectly valued his business because it failed to reduce the valuation amount to account for estimated personal income tax payments owed by husband and that the trial court incorrectly included goodwill as an asset of the business.
Zeefe v. Zeefe
At issue is the valuation of husband's auto parts business.
Favell v. Favell
One issue in this case was the deduction in value due to a covenant not to compete.
Roden v. Roden
At issue is the valuation of the couple's ice cream business.
More Court Cases... Marital Dissolution: Milbauer
The parties were in significant disagreement with respect to the value of the defendant's interest in a business (a warehousing and freight forwarding company that augmented the defendant's ...
Court finds capitalization of cash flow method most appropriate
At issue is the value of husband's interest in three different corporations that operate residential and commercial refuse removal services in Fairfield County and parts of Westchester and Putnam Counties in New York.
Should Court Have Relied Upon Opinion of Wife's Expert Regarding Value of Husband’s Business?
Husband appeals portions of a judgment that awarded the plaintiff wife 40% of the value of his share of a business.
Cheatham v. Cheatham
Issue is the valuation of husband's 65% interest in a computer consulting business, and whether the wife's expert erred in failing to consider pattern of declining earnings.
Reeves v. Reeves
At issue is the valuation of the marital property.