Bungard v. Bungard
On appeal the wife argues that the trial court should not have deducted certain expenses from her expert's valuation of husband's veterinary practice. At issue also is the date of valuation ...
Boyd v. Boyd
Issue is whether the trial court erred in valuing the husband's business, and including an amount for goodwill in the value.
Opinion of Goodwill for practice of Dr. Fredirick I. Field
This document is in .pdf and requires Adobe Acrobat for viewing. Click here to download Adobe Acrobat.
Declaration of Carol Jean Thompson in Support of Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration
This document is in .pdf and requires Adobe Acrobat for viewing. Click here to download Adobe Acrobat.
Kussatz-Jakobson v. Jakobson
Issue is whether the trial court erred by affirming the parties’ antenuptial agreement and determining the value of a corporation owned by the parties.
Guthmiller v. Guthmiller
Issue is the failure of the trial court to determine a value of the husband's insurance business where neither party presented expert testimony of the value of the business.
Wilson v. Wilson
Issue involves the increase in value of the husband's business during the marriage.
Wright v. Wright
Wife raised issues concerning the court's valuation of a veterinary clinic, including goodwill.
Undocumented shareholder loan not relevant to value
One of the issues in this marital dissolution was the value of the husband’s 7% interest in the family wheat farm, Jensen Seed Farm, Inc.
Separation date value abuse of discretion
During the parties’ marriage, husband founded and operated Cooper Management Institute.
Court affirms value based on capitalization of earnings method
One of the issues in this case was the value of husband's business, Johnson Poured Walls.
Valuation disregarding restrictive stock agreement upheld on appeal
A major issue in this marital dissolution was the valuation of husband’s 200 shares of stock in Pella Windows & Doors Inc.
Trial court’s 'arbitrary value' reversed, remanded
One of the issues in this marital dissolution was the value of husband’s trucking and storage business.
Fierro v. Templeton
Issue in this corporate dissolution was the fair value of Templeton's 50% interest pursuant to Fierro's election to purchase in lieu of dissolution.
Zasler v. Zasler
Appeals court affirmed the valuation of wife's expert. His valuation used capitalization of historical income (husband took no salary at the time) and commercial goodwill (he felt husband's personal goodwill shouldn't be taken into account).
Bass v. Bass
Issue is whether valuation of the goodwill of bonding business is speculative in light of the absence of any real market value for bail bonding businesses.
Kerce v. Kerce
Issue was the valuation of the parties' book import business, and the proper methodology for determining value.
Valuation Based on Pricing Formula in Buy-Sell Agreement Upheld
Husband was a part owner of Pingree & Watterworth PA, an orthodontic practice.
Seiler v. Seiler
Issue is whether speculative tax consequences are an element of valuing an ongoing business, in this case an accounting practice.
Ventimiglia v. Ventimiglia
Ordered that the appeal and cross appeal from the judgment are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the judgment was superseded by the amended judgment.
Prenuptial Agreement Unenforceable Where Not All Assets Disclosed
At the husband's request, the wife signed a prenuptial agreement the day before their wedding.
In re the Marriage of Rubens
Issue is whether the trial court erred in using a pre-separation date as the valuation date of husband's neurology practice.
In re the Marriage of Gottsacker
Whether an Accumulated Adjustment Account (AAA) in a subchapter S corporation in which one spouse has a nonmarital interest is marital property depends on the degree of ownership and control ...
Arn v. Arn
Issue is the valuation of husband's interest in wine company where he originally purchased 20% interest and later purchased remaining 80% but sale was still in escrow.
Pattinson v. Pattinson (II)
Issue in this post-dissolution matter was whether the court erred in re-evaluating the original valuation of the husband’s business.