General Electric Co. v. Joiner
Supreme Court holds that appeals court must review trial court’s exclusion of expert testimony pursuant to Daubert under abuse of discretion standard and district court in case did not err in finding testimony irrelevant and unreliable.
Expert Disqualified per Daubert Case
The issue in this case was the defendants' motion to exclude from trial, pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 104(a) and 702, and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals , 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the testimony of Hugh Penny, a C.P.A., plaintiffs' putative financial expert on the value of Plaintiffs' Animated Playhouse Corp. (APC) shares and Andrew Whelan's lost employment income from APC.
Whelan v. Abell
At issue is plaintiff's third claim for damages for loss of an opportunity to develop certain T.J. Applebee's restaurants.
Newport Ltd. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Issue is a Motion in Limine to exclude expert testimony of lost profits, applying Daubert standard.
City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcos Chemicals
Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages for defendants' "illegal conspiracy to restrain trade by fixing prices, allocating markets, and rigging bids for sale of repackaged chlorine."
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which ended by promulgating a new “gatekeeping” function for federal judges and developing an evidentiary standard now known by a single name: Daubert.
Landmark Daubert Decision Develops New Standard for Admission of Expert Evidence
Landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which ended by promulgating a new “gatekeeping” function for federal judges and developing an evidentiary standard now known by a single name: Daubert.