The Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. George E. Pataki
At issue are the valuation of property and the admissibility of expert testimony.
Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.
This case involves numerous motions to exclude expert testimony on damages and related matters under the Daubert standard.
In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation
Suit against manufacturers and wholesalers of brand-name prescription drugs charging conspiracy to deny discounts to the pharmacies. Admissibility of experts at issue.
Speakers discuss landmark cases, market approach and discounts
This report concludes our coverage of the Nov. 15-17 AICPA Business Valuation Conference. For summaries of other presentations and a list of audiotapes available, see BVU December, 1998, pp. 1-4.
Nilssen v. Motorola, Inc. (I)
Issues involve several motions in limine to exclude expert testimony in intellectual property dispute.
Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosier
This case is an appeal from an order of a magistrate judge denying Sara Lee's motion to exclude expert testimony at trial under Daubert.
Robert Billet Promotions, Inc. v. IMI Cornelius
Robert Billet Promotions intends to offer an accountant, Charles S. Lunden, as a damages expert in support of a breach of contract claim.
Credibility is bottom line in expert testimony.
JJ: What is the daily routine of judges like yourself, and what types of cases are typically heard in family law courts? Judge Welch: Family law court dockets tend to deal with personal crisis issu ...
Robert Billet Promotions, Inc. v. IMI Cornelius, Inc.
The court applied Daubert in evaluating the admissibility of expert's damages testimony.
Institute of Business Appraisers 20th anniversary conference open with IRS attorney; closes with estate planning attorney
n LITIGATING ISSUES IN THE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ARENA Melanie Urban, Esq. Internal Revenue Service Houston, TX Ms. Urban opened with a declaration that there are two things that the IR ...
Carmichael v. Samyang Tire, Inc.
At issue is the admittance of expert testimony.
General Electric Co. v. Joiner
Supreme Court holds that appeals court must review trial court’s exclusion of expert testimony pursuant to Daubert under abuse of discretion standard and district court in case did not err in finding testimony irrelevant and unreliable.
Expert Disqualified per Daubert Case
The issue in this case was the defendants' motion to exclude from trial, pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 104(a) and 702, and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals , 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the testimony of Hugh Penny, a C.P.A., plaintiffs' putative financial expert on the value of Plaintiffs' Animated Playhouse Corp. (APC) shares and Andrew Whelan's lost employment income from APC.
Whelan v. Abell
At issue is plaintiff's third claim for damages for loss of an opportunity to develop certain T.J. Applebee's restaurants.
Newport Ltd. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Issue is a Motion in Limine to exclude expert testimony of lost profits, applying Daubert standard.
City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcos Chemicals
Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages for defendants' "illegal conspiracy to restrain trade by fixing prices, allocating markets, and rigging bids for sale of repackaged chlorine."
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which ended by promulgating a new “gatekeeping” function for federal judges and developing an evidentiary standard now known by a single name: Daubert.
Landmark Daubert Decision Develops New Standard for Admission of Expert Evidence
Landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which ended by promulgating a new “gatekeeping” function for federal judges and developing an evidentiary standard now known by a single name: Daubert.