In re Robert E. Mahoney, Jr. Debtor
At issue is the fair market value of 4,500 shares of Quality Systems Associates Inc.
In re Zenith Electronics Corporation, Debtor
At issue are the approval of Zenith's Disclosure Statement and confirmation of Pre-Packaged Plan of Reorganization, including the valuation of Zenith.
In re Valley-Vulcan Mold Co., Debtor
At issue is whether the bankruptcy court erred in admitting expert testimony on matters of valuation.
Solvency Opinions Admissible in Bankruptcy Court
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court's decision to permit expert testimony regarding the solvency of the debtor on the date of the alleged preferential transfer.
In re Resorts International
At issue are the appraisal rights of the shareholder after a merger.
In re Resorts International
The District Court reversed a Bankruptcy Court order that awarded Resorts International full restitution for a loss resulting from a stock transaction.
In re Westpointe
At issue is the valuation of the bankruptcy estates.
In re Westpointe
In this Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding, the valuation method the Bankruptcy Court relied upon in valuing the "going concern" of the properties is in dispute.
In re John Joseph Edwards
At issue is breach of fiduciary duty by the trustee in regards to the sale price.
In re John Joseph Edwards
The main issue in this bankruptcy case (third and final opinion on the matter) is the objection of debtor, Edwards, to the disposition of his assets by the Chapter 7 Trustee.
In Re Stephen L. Vecchitto
At issue is the valuation of 220 shares of stock of a closely-held corporation.
In Re Stephen L. Vecchitto
The trustee sued a Chapter 7 bankruptcy debtor to avoid the transfer of certain shares of stock that debtor declared valueless.
In re Thomas, Debtors
At issue is the value of a secured claim held by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") in the Debtors' stock in a closely held corporation.
Value of One-Man Delivery Business Includes Goodwill
The Internal Revenue Service filed a secured claim in the debtors' Chapter 13 bankruptcy case.
Scott v. Universal Fidelity Group
At issue is the meaning of "net worth" under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("the FDCPA").
Scott v. Universal Fidelity Group
Scott sought to compel discovery of defendant's financial picture. Discussion of the meaning of "net worth" within the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ensued.
In Re Kool, Mann, Coffee and Co.
At issue is the valuation of a marina/houseboat business.
In Re Kool, Mann, Coffee and Co.
Buyers purchased a marina business under fraudulent misrepresentation.
Stock Recipients Liable for Fraudulent Transfer Underpayment
The issue was whether the transfer of stock of Danbury Surgical Center Inc. (DSC) and Bridgeport Surgical Center Inc. (BSC) by debtors Jonathan Googel and Benjamin Sisti to the defendants Gerald Steinberg and Robert Simons were fraudulent transfers under Bankruptcy Code § 548(a).
Prudent Investor Method Used to Value Unfunded Pension Benefits Claim
CF & I Fabricators of Utah Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and Pension Benefits Guaranty Corp. seeks, among other things, payment for unfunded benefit liabilities accruing because of the lack of assets in the benefit plan.
Market Rate of Interest Appropriate in 'Cram-Down' Case
The key issue in this case is setting the appropriate interest rate to establish present value in a "cram down" situation under 11 U.S.C. 1325(a)(5)(B).
In re Colonial Realty Company; Hirsch v. Steinberg (II)
The issue was whether the transfer of stock of Danbury Surgical Center Inc. (DSC) and Bridgeport Surgical Center Inc. (BSC) by debtors Jonathan Googel and Benjamin Sisti to the defendants Gerald Steinberg and Robert Simons were fraudulent transfers under Bankruptcy Code § 548(a).
Bankruptcy Reorganization Uses Market Rates of Interest
The common issue in these two cases is setting appropriate interest rates to establish present value in "cram down" situations.
In re Glueck
The key issue in this case is setting the appropriate interest rate to establish present value in a "cram down" situation under 11 U.S.C. 1325(a)(5)(B).
Pension Benefits Guaranty Corp. v. CF&I Fabricators (In re: CF&I Fabricators)
Parties disagree as to the method that should be employed to determine the present value of future payments because of two ERISA provisions.