Trademark Damages Not Contingent on Established Royalty

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 11
Legal and Court Case Update
November 2013

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,334 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3431 Enameled Iron and Metal Sanitary Ware
332999 All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing
intellectual property
trademark infringement, daubert, expert testimony, reasonable royalty, license agreement
ITT Corp. v. Xylem Group, LLC
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109381
August 5, 2013
US
Federal Court
Georgia
United States District Court
Robert N. Yerman, Philip G. Hampton, II (plaintiffs); Robert A. Hutchins (defendant)
Duffey, Jr.

Summary

District court dismisses plaintiffs’ overarching claim that a reasonable royalty was not an allowable damage theory in a trademark case, as well as its narrower claim that a royalty was available only to the plaintiff that could point to an established ro ...

See Also

ITT Corp. v. Xylem Group, LLC

Full Text of Court Cases
August 5, 2013

District court dismisses plaintiffs’ overarching claim that a reasonable royalty was not an allowable damage theory in a trademark case, as well as its narrower claim that a royalty was available only to the plaintiff that could point to an established ro ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 11
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition