Test Case Considers Proper Framework for RAND Royalty Rates

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 1
Legal and Court Case Update
January 2013

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,633 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7371 Computer Programming Services
541511 Custom Computer Programming Services
intellectual property
Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc. (I)
2012 LEXIS 152244
October 22, 2012
US
Federal Court
Washington
United States District Court
Charles R. Donohue and Ramamirthan Sukumar (Motorola); Kevin Murphy, Matthew Lynde, and Timothy Simcoe (Microsoft)
Robart

Summary

Federal district court rules that the adaptable Daubert standard can accommodate two different frameworks for analyzing RAND royalty rates for standard-essential patents, a typical “bilateral” hypothetical negotiation between the parties and a fairly new ...

See Also

Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc. (I)

Full Text of Court Cases
October 22, 2012

Federal district court rules that the adaptable Daubert standard can accommodate two different frameworks for analyzing RAND royalty rates for standard-essential patents, a typical “bilateral” hypothetical negotiation between the parties and a fairly new ...