Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc. (I)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 22, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,452 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7371 Computer Programming Services
541511 Custom Computer Programming Services
intellectual property
Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc. (I)
2012 LEXIS 152244
US
Federal Court
Washington
United States District Court
Charles R. Donohue and Ramamirthan Sukumar (Motorola); Kevin Murphy, Matthew Lynde, and Timothy Simcoe (Microsoft)
Robart

Summary

Federal district court rules that the adaptable Daubert standard can accommodate two different frameworks for analyzing RAND royalty rates for standard-essential patents, a typical “bilateral” hypothetical negotiation between the parties and a fairly new ...
Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc. (I)
PDF, Size: 89 KB

See Also

Test Case Considers Proper Framework for RAND Royalty Rates

Legal and Court Case Update
January 2013

Federal district court rules that the adaptable Daubert standard can accommodate two different frameworks for analyzing RAND royalty rates for standard-essential patents, a typical “bilateral” hypothetical negotiation between the parties and a fairly new ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Second Edition